Kenneth Linwood Awkard v. Commonwealth

2267932Vactapp

Gesamter Gesetzestext

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Before: 	Chief Judge Moon, Judges Baker, Benton, Coleman,
Koontz,* Willis, Elder, Bray and Fitzpatrick
Argued at Richmond, Virginia
KENNETH LINWOOD AWKARD
v. 	Record No. 2267-93-2 	OPINION
BY JUDGE JOSEPH E. BAKER
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 	SEPTEMBER 5, 1995
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY
Paul M. Peatross, Jr., Judge
Francis McQ. Lawrence (Ronald M. Huber; St. John,
Bowling & Lawrence, on brief), for appellant.
Leah A. Darron, Assistant Attorney General
(James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief),
for appellee.
By opinion dated February 14, 1995,1 a panel of this Court
reversed Kenneth Linwood Awkard's (appellant) felony sentence
imposed upon him by the Circuit Court of Albemarle County (trial
court) and remanded the case to the trial court for a
re-sentencing pursuant to the misdemeanor provisions of Code
§ 46.2-357, as amended. 	This Code section became effective after
appellant was convicted but prior to the date of his sentencing
hearing. 	The facts as stated in the panel majority and dissent
are complete and need not be restated here.
*Justice Koontz participated in the hearing and decision of
this case prior to his investiture as a Justice of the Supreme
Court of Virginia.
1See Awkard v. Commonwealth, 19 Va. App. 605, 454 S.E.2d 18
(1995).
- 2 -
Upon rehearing en banc, we hold that whether the felony or
misdemeanor punishment should have been imposed in this case was
a matter committed to the discretionary power of the trial court.
Because the sentence given was within the statutory limits
prescribed by Code § 46.2-357, to which appellant pled guilty, we
find no abuse of discretion.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
- 3 -
Fitzpatrick, J., with whom Benton, Koontz and Elder, J.J., join,
dissenting.
I would reverse appellant's felony conviction and remand for
re-sentencing for the reasons stated in the majority opinion of
the panel decision. 	See Awkard v. Commonwealth, 19 Va. App. 605,
454 S.E.2d 18 (1995).

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.