CourtListener 10778393•William T. Kiper v. Juan Carlos Gomez-Figueroa
William T. Kiper v. Juan Carlos Gomez-Figueroa
CourtListener 10778393Txctapp922.01.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00366-CV
__________________
WILLIAM T. KIPER, Appellant
V.
JUAN CARLOS GOMEZ-FIGUEROA, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 457th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 25-04-05162
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant William T. Kiper filed a notice of appeal from an order denying a
motion for summary judgment. Appellee Juan Carlos Gomez-Figueroa filed a
motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Kiper did not file a response. Generally,
appeals may be taken only from final judgments or interlocutory orders that are
otherwise appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195,
200 (Tex. 2001); see Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012 (appeal from
final judgment), 51.014 (authorizes accelerated appeals from certain interlocutory
1
orders). A judgment or order is final if it disposes of every pending claim and party.
Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 205. An order denying a motion for summary judgment does
not finally dispose of the plaintiff’s claims. Appellate courts have jurisdiction over
appeals from interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly provides such
jurisdiction. See Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840 (Tex.
2007). A denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and it is
therefore generally not appealable. Cincinnati Life Ins. Co. v. Cates, 927 S.W.2d
623, 625 (Tex. 1996); Mitchell v. Thomas, No. 09-24-00035-CV, 2026 Tex. App.
LEXIS 140, *12 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Jan. 8, 2026, no pet. h.) (mem. op.)
(“Absent a final judgment, we do not have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal,
unless authorized by statute.”); Brannon v. Kaur, No. 05-20-00718-CV, 2020 Tex.
App. LEXIS 7657, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Sept. 21, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See
Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on January 21, 2026
Opinion Delivered January 22, 2026
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.