CourtListener 9536982•In Re: United Rentals North America, Inc. v. the State of Texas
In Re: United Rentals North America, Inc. v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 9536982Txctapp507.06.2024
Gesamter Gesetzestext
DENIED and Opinion Filed June 7, 2024
S In the
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00673-CV
IN RE UNITED RENTALS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Relator
Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-04449
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Breedlove
Opinion by Justice Carlyle
Before the Court are relator’s June 4, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus and
emergency motion for temporary relief. In its petition, relator contends that the trial
court abused its discretion by refusing to set its motion to transfer venue for hearing
and by striking the motion to transfer venue. In its emergency motion, relator seeks
to stay the trial specially set for June 10, 2024.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition and the record before us, we conclude
that relator has failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a). We also deny relator’s emergency motion as moot.
/Cory L. Carlyle/
CORY L. CARLYLE
240673F.P05 JUSTICE
–2–
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.