CourtListener 10277668•In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas
In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10277668Txctapp514.11.2024
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Denied and Opinion Filed November 14, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-01306-CV
IN RE CHARLES J. JAYROE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 219-55128-2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia
Opinion by Justice Smith
Relator, who is proceeding pro se, filed a November 8, 2024 petition for writ
of mandamus asking this Court to compel the trial court to promptly review all
pending motions, conduct an expedited hearing on a motion for contempt, dismiss
or strike an Order of Enforcement by Contempt and Suspension of Sentence against
relator, ensure that all motions and requests are promptly presented to the judge for
immediate review, expand the scope of relator’s counsel’s representation, and
modify relator’s visitation with his child.
Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(g), (h), (j), (k)(1)(A); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a).
Because relator’s petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief, we deny the petition.
Additionally, relator’s separately filed record discloses unredacted sensitive
data, including a minor’s full name, birthdate, and address, in violation of the Texas
Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9. Accordingly, we strike
relator’s separately filed record.
241306f.p05 /Craig Smith//
CRAIG SMITH
JUSTICE
–2–
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.