In Re: Lorne Ross v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10144485Txctapp508.10.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

DENIED and Opinion Filed October 8, 2024

In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-01109-CV

IN RE LORNE ROSS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 397th Judicial District Court
Grayson County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 45804

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Breedlove
Opinion by Justice Breedlove
Before the Court is relator’s September 20, 2024 petition for writ of

mandamus. Relator argues that the trial court is failing to properly enforce relator’s

purported plea agreement. Relator’s petition, however, does not comply with the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in numerous respects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1;

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(g)–(h), (j), (k)(1)(A); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a). Thus, relator’s

petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re Guillaume, No. 05-24-00765-CV,

2024 WL 3548511, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 26, 2024, orig. proceeding) (mem.
op.) (denying mandamus relief based on relator’s failure to comply with several

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition.

/Maricela Breedlove/
241109f.p05 MARICELA BREEDLOVE
JUSTICE

–2–

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.