CourtListener 10128491•Doris Raphel v. BT Pegasus Two LLC
Gesamter Gesetzestext
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 27, 2024
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00327-CV
DORIS RAPHEL, Appellant
V.
BT PEGASUS TWO LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01344-E
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Carlyle
Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
Appellant’s brief in this appeal is overdue. After appellant failed to respond
to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted
without the reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by August 9, 2024.
By postcard dated August 13, 2024, we informed appellant the brief was overdue
and directed appellant to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that
failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief nor otherwise
corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b),
(c).
/Robert D. Burns, III/
ROBERT D. BURNS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE
240327F.P05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
DORIS RAPHEL, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at
Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-24-00327-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01344-
E.
BT PEGASUS TWO LLC, Appellee Opinion delivered by Chief Justice
Burns. Justices Molberg and Carlyle
participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is
DISMISSED.
Judgment entered September 27, 2024
–3–
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.