CourtListener 10842234•Bryan Keith Gutierrez v. the State of Texas
Bryan Keith Gutierrez v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10842234Txctapp408.04.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00160-CR
Bryan Keith GUTIERREZ,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas
Trial Court No. 25-09-00102-CRK
Honorable Jennifer Dillingham, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2026
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
The clerk’s record reflects that on March 2, 2026, appellant filed a “Motion for Bond
Relief” in this court, appearing to challenge the amount set as bail and requesting that several
indictments against him be quashed. The record does not reflect a judgment of conviction. We
liberally construe appellant’s motion as a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2.
“Jurisdiction must be expressly given to the courts of appeals in a statute.” Ragston v. State,
424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). “There is no constitutional or statutory authority
04-26-00160-CR
granting the courts of appeals jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals regarding excessive bail or
the denial of bail.” Id. And we have no jurisdiction to review an interlocutory order denying a
motion to quash an indictment. Ex parte Alvear, 524 S.W.3d 261, 263 (Tex. App.—Waco 2016,
no pet.).
We accordingly ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed
for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.