In Re Romeo Alberto Ibanez-Barrera v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10745473Txctapp426.11.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00732-CR

In re Romeo Alberto IBANEZ-BARRERA, Relator

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 26, 2025

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 13, 2025, we affirmed two judgments of conviction entered against Romeo

Alberto Ibanez-Barrera for murder and for tampering with evidence in his direct appeal from these

judgments. See Ibanez-Barrera v. State, No. 04-23-00011-CR, 2025 WL 782698, at *1 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio Mar. 12, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). On April

17, 2025, we denied Ibanez-Barrera’s motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration.

Ibanez-Barrera did not file a petition for discretionary review with the Texas Court of Criminal

Appeals, and, on May 22, 2025, we issued our mandate.

1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 21-CR-25, styled State of Texas v. Romeo Alberto Ibanez-Barrera, in the
381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas, the Honorable Jose Luis Garza presiding.
04-25-00732-CR

On November 14, 2025, Ibanez-Barrera, filed a “Motion for Leave of Court to file A

Petition for Writ of Mandamus,” which we construe as a petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex.

R. App. P. 52.1. After considering Ibanez-Barrera’s petition for writ of mandamus, we conclude

he is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, his petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.