Joseph Garren Martinez v. the State of Texas

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00537-CR

Joseph Garren MARTINEZ,
Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,
Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas
Trial Court No. 22-07-0253-CRA
Honorable Jennifer Dillingham, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Adrian A. Spears II, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 19, 2025

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Joseph Garren Martinez pled guilty to evading arrest

or detention with a vehicle and was sentenced to twelve years in prison in accordance with the

terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On July 29, 2025, the trial court signed a certification of

defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right

of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Martinez filed a notice of appeal, the trial court
04-25-00537-CR

clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s

record, which includes the trial court’s certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to

appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The

clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the punishment assessed by the

trial court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by

Martinez. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before

trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See id. Thus, the trial

court’s certification appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Martinez

does not have the right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).

We informed Martinez that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that Martinez had

the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See id. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State,

110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended trial court certification

has been filed. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-