CourtListener 10852468•Ignacio Villegas v. the State of Texas
Gesamter Gesetzestext
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-26-00076-CR
___________________________
IGNACIO VILLEGAS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 16th District Court
Denton County, Texas
Trial Court No. F25-555-16
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Ignacio Villegas, proceeding pro se, attempts to appeal his conviction
for driving while intoxicated third or more. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04,
49.09(b)(2). Pursuant to a plea bargain, Villegas pleaded guilty to that offense in
exchange for the State’s recommending that his punishment be assessed at ten years’
confinement, probated for seven years, and a $1,000 fine. As part of his written plea
agreement, Villegas waived any right of appeal, and he was admonished that if the trial
court followed the plea agreement, he could not appeal his case without permission
from the trial court “except for matters raised by written motions filed prior to trial.”
In accordance with the parties’ agreement, the trial court found Villegas guilty
and sentenced him to ten years’ confinement, probated for seven years, and fined him
$1,000. The trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal, which was signed
by Villegas, states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of
appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court also certified that Villegas
“has waived the right of appeal.”
After receiving a copy of Villegas’s notice of appeal, we notified him that we
had received the trial court’s certification stating that this is a plea-bargain case, that
he has no right of appeal, and that he waived the right of appeal. We warned him that
unless he filed a response by March 19, 2026, showing grounds for continuing the
appeal, this appeal could be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We did not
receive a response.
2
Thus, in accordance with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss the appeal
for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: April 30, 2026
3
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.