Reginald Munoz v. Caden York

CourtListener 10848293Txctapp223.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-26-00122-CV
___________________________

REGINALD MUNOZ, Appellant

V.

CADEN YORK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 89th District Court
Wichita County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC89-CV2023-2209

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 25, 2026, and March 11, 2026, we notified appellant, in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal

unless appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant

has not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has not complied with a procedural requirement and the

Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: April 23, 2026

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases
1

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation,
Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.