CourtListener 10802229•In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas
In Re Rashad Brazier v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10802229Txctapp225.02.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
FILED
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FEB 25 2026
CLARISSA HODGES, CLERK
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
No. 02-26-00118-CV
IN RE RASHAD BRAZIER, Relator
Original Proceeding
County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2026-000757-1
Before Walker, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion
for temporary telief and stay pending mandamus and is of the opinion that relief
should be denied. Relator’s petition is not supported by authorities, is not supported
by documentation, and is not certified. See Tex. R. App. 52.3(h), (j), (k). Neither
Relator’s petition nor his motion identifies who the real party in interest is or shows
that he has notified the trial court or the real party in interest that he has filed the
petition and motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.2, 52.10(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition
for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary telief and stay pending mandamus
ate denied.
Per Curiam
Delivered: February 25, 2026
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.