Joseph Kelly Dingler v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10782723Txctapp230.01.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________

No. 02-25-00458-CR
___________________________

JOSEPH KELLY DINGLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 432nd District Court
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1749454

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant Joseph Kelly Dingler pleaded guilty to

possession of a controlled substance in Penalty Group I, see Tex. Health & Safety

Code Ann. § 481.115(d), and the trial court assessed his punishment at three years’

confinement. Appellant attempts to appeal his conviction. But the trial court signed

a certification of Appellant’s right to appeal—which Appellant also signed—stating

that this criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal.”

After receiving Appellant’s notice of appeal, we notified him that we had

received the trial court’s certification. We warned him that the appeal could be

dismissed unless he or another party filed by January 15, 2026, a response showing

grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. We have

received no response.

Thus, in accordance with the trial court’s certification, we dismiss Appellant’s

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex.

Crim. App. 2006); Joseph v. State, No. 02-25-00335-CR, 2025 WL 2942406, at *1 (Tex.

App.—Fort Worth Oct. 16, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: January 30, 2026

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.