In Re Edward Alexander, Adam P. Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin, Individually and as Co-Trustees v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 9517987Txctapp1406.06.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June
6, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00048-CV

IN RE EDWARD ALEXANDER, ADAM P. JOHNSON, WAYNE S.
THOMPSON, JR., JUDGE LILYNN CUTRER, AND KAREN AUCOIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS CO-TRUSTEES, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Probate Court No 4
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 365-053-404

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On Thursday, January 18, 2024, relators Edward Alexander, Adam P.
Johnson, Wayne S. Thompson, Jr., Judge Lilynn Cutrer, and Karen Aucoin,
Individually and as Co-Trustees, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.
See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition,
relators ask this court to compel the Honorable James Horowitz, presiding judge of
the Probate Court No. 4 of Harris County, to vacate his order denying summary
judgment and enter an order granting realtors’ motion for summary judgment.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We lift our May 30,
2024 order staying trial court proceedings.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, Poissant.

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.