CourtListener 9501386•Lawrence Edward Thompson v. Unknown Harris County Sheriff's Deputy/Jailer
Lawrence Edward Thompson v. Unknown Harris County Sheriff's Deputy/Jailer
CourtListener 9501386Txctapp1407.05.2024
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 7, 2024
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00238-CV
LAWRENCE EDWARD THOMPSON, Appellant
V.
UNKNOWN HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY/JAILER, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1195687
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an order dismissing the underlying case for
want of prosecution signed December 4, 2023. On January 10, 2024, appellant
filed an untimely and unverified motion to reinstate the appeal. See Tex. R. Civ. P.
165a(3) (providing that a motion to reinstate must be verified and filed within 30
days after the order of dismissal is signed). Because the motion was not timely
filed, the appellate deadlines were not extended. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a)(3)
(extending deadline for filing notice of appeal to 90 days when a timely motion to
reinstate has been filed). Accordingly, appellant’s notice of appeal was due January
3, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on February
26, 2024.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend time is
necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal
beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within
the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time.
See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing the
predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-
day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.
On April 10, 2024, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was
subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.