Dayton Leissner v. Gary C. Ford and John Marcus Beatty

CourtListener 10659166Txctapp1321.08.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NUMBER 13-25-00344-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________

DAYTON LEISSNER, Appellant,

v.

GARY C. FORD AND
JOHN MARCUS BEATTY, Appellees.
____________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE 23RD DISTRICT COURT
OF MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS
____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Silva, Peña, and Cron
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Cron

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal.

Appellant no longer desires to pursue the appeal and has conferred with appellees who

do not oppose the dismissal.
The Court, having considered the unopposed motion to dismiss appeal, is of the

opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the

unopposed motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. In

accordance with the unopposed motion, costs are taxed against the party incurring the

same. Having dismissed the appeal at the appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing

will be entertained.

JENNY CRON
Justice

Delivered and filed on the
21st day of August, 2025.

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.