CourtListener 10646848•Felecia Kemari v. MB & RB Investments, LLC
Felecia Kemari v. MB & RB Investments, LLC
CourtListener 10646848Txctapp1331.07.2025
Gesamter Gesetzestext
NUMBER 13-25-00199-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
FELECIA KEMARI, Appellant,
v.
MB & RB INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1
OF HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina
This cause is before the Court on its own motion.1 On February 28, 2025, appellant
filed a notice of appeal. The clerk's record was due on April 28, 2025. On June 27, 2025,
the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the deputy district clerk, Darren Jones, had
1
This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket
equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
notified the Court that appellant had failed to make arrangements for payment of the
clerk’s record. Appellant was further notified that unless she made arrangements to pay
for the clerk’s record and proof of payment was provided to the Court within ten days, the
appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. 37.3(b).
Appellant has failed to respond or otherwise provide the requested documentation.
No clerk’s record has been filed due to appellant’s failure to pay or make payment
arrangements, and appellant has failed to comply with a notice from the Clerk of the Court
requiring a response or other action within the time specified; accordingly, the appeal is
dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
JAIME TIJERINA
Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the
31st day of July, 2025.
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.