Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

CourtListener 10646828Txctapp1331.07.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NUMBER 13-25-00328-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

STEPHEN PAUL CARRIGAN, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSION FOR
LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 148TH DISTRICT COURT
OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Fonseca

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss. Appellant no

longer wishes to pursue this appeal.

The Court, having considered the motion, is of the opinion that the motion should

be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted,
and the appeal is hereby dismissed. The costs are taxed against the appellant. See id. R.

42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained.

YSMAEL D. FONSECA
Justice

Delivered and filed on the
31st day of July, 2025.

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.