Amazon Services, LLC and Kenzie's Optics, Inc. v. Benjamin D. Winston, II

CourtListener 8510988Txctapp1209.11.2022

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NO. 12-22-00163-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

AMAZON SERVICES, LLC AND § APPEAL FROM THE 159TH
KENZIE’S OPTICS, INC.,
APPELLANTS
§ JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
V.

BENJAMIN D. WINSTON, II, § ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS
APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellants, Amazon Services, LLC and Kenzie’s Optics, Inc., filed an unopposed motion
to dismiss this appeal, stating that they no longer wish to pursue the appeal. Appellants’ motion
to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
Opinion delivered November 9, 2022.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 9, 2022

NO. 12-22-00163-CV

AMAZON SERVICES, LLC AND KENZIE’S OPTICS, INC.,
Appellants
V.
BENJAMIN D. WINSTON, II,
Appellee

Appeal from the 159th District Court
of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV-01103-21-06)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the
Appellants to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED,
ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal
be dismissed, and that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.