CourtListener 10870392•Jayson MacE Thiebaud v. the State of Texas
Jayson MacE Thiebaud v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10870392Txctapp1004.06.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-25-00178-CR
Jayson Mace Thiebaud,
Appellant
v.
The State of Texas,
Appellee
On appeal from the
18th District Court of Somervell County, Texas
Judge Sydney B. Hewlett, presiding
Trial Court Cause No. 23-213-DCCR-00038
JUSTICE HARRIS delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jayson Mace Thiebaud was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in
prison. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Thiebaud’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and an Anders
brief in support of the motion asserting that he has diligently reviewed the
appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Counsel's
brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error and compliance
with the other duties of appointed counsel. We conclude that counsel has
performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders, 386 U.S. at
744; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); see also Kelly
v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252
S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all
the proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." Anders, 386
U.S. at 744; see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S. Ct. 346, 102 L. Ed. 2d
300 (1988); accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App.
1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any
basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10, 108
S. Ct. 1895, 100 L. Ed. 2d 440 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this
appeal, we have determined the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v.
State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm
the trial court's judgment.
Counsel's motion to withdraw from representation of Thiebaud is
granted.
LEE HARRIS
Justice
Thiebaud v. State Page 2
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: June 4, 2026
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Affirmed; motion granted
Do Not Publish
CRPM
Thiebaud v. State Page 3
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.