CourtListener 10841802•Deveraux August Severin v. Phoebe Ann Lewis
Deveraux August Severin v. Phoebe Ann Lewis
CourtListener 10841802Txctapp131.03.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Opinion issued March 31, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-25-00435-CV
———————————
DEVERAUX AUGUST SEVERIN, Appellant
V.
PHOEBE ANN LEWIS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1245294
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Deveraux August Severin, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of
appeal challenging the trial court’s final judgment granting Appellee Phoebe Ann
Lewis a sum of $2,900.
On September 23, 2025, we abated the appeal, referred the parties to
mediation, and directed the parties to file a status report within 50 days of our order.
The parties did not respond. On January 8, 2026, we ordered the parties to file a
status report notifying the Court whether mediation had been conducted. We noted
that failure to respond would result in reinstatement of the appeal. The parties again
failed to respond.
On February 12, 2026, we reinstated the appeal and ordered Appellant to file
his appellate brief within 30 days of the date of the order, making Appellant’s brief
due on March 16, 2026. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), (d). We cautioned that failure
to file the brief by the stated deadline could result in dismissal of the appeal. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) (appeal may be dismissed for appellant’s failure to timely
file brief).
To date, Appellant has not filed his appellate brief. Because Appellant failed
to file an appellate brief as directed by the Court’s order, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b)–(c), 43.2(f).
Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.