CourtListener 10663883•Vicki Rosborough v. TD Industries, INC.
Vicki Rosborough v. TD Industries, INC.
CourtListener 10663883Txctapp128.08.2025
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Opinion issued August 28, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-25-00019-CV
———————————
VICKI ROSBOROUGH, Appellant
V.
TD INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 215th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 2018-17077
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 12, 2025, we sent notice to the parties that it appeared that we
lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because the appellate record lacked any final
judgment and that counterclaims remained below. On August 22, 2025, appellant
filed an unopposed motion to abate the appeal, conceding that the record did not
contain a final judgment, but requesting that we abate the appeal for the trial court
to sign a final judgment.
Generally, appeals may be taken only from signed, final judgments. See
Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); see also TEX. R.
APP. P. 26.1 (appellate timetable runs from the date the judgment or order is
signed). The clerk’s record must include a copy of the court’s judgment or other
order being appealed. TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5. An appellant may file a notice of
appeal before the trial court reduces the judgment to writing and signs it, but the
appellate court will not proceed until a written, signed judgment has been filed.
TEX. R. APP. P. 27.1; see State v. Shaw, 4 S.W.3d 875, 878 (Tex. App.—Dallas
1999, no pet.) (stating that docket sheet entry is not substitute for signed written
order).
Further, the record shows that an underlying defendant has a pending
counterclaim below. See New York Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Sanchez, 799 S.W.2d
677, 678–79 (Tex. 1990) (“In the absence of a special statute making an
interlocutory order appealable, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in
the case, including those presented by counterclaim or cross action, to be final and
appealable.”); Palavan v. McCulley, Boulevard Realty LLC, and TBW Dev., LLC,
No. 01-14-00604-CV, 2015 WL 1544520, at *1–2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
2
Apr. 2, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.) (concluding that appellate court lacked
jurisdiction because counterclaims remained pending).
Although we can abate for the trial court to clarify whether its judgment was
final, no clarification is needed here because, as conceded by appellant, the trial
court has not signed a final judgment. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 206 & n.92.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(a). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Caughey and Johnson.
3
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.