Ahmad Fatemizadeh v. Sugar Creek Country Club

CourtListener 10659637Txctapp119.08.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Opinion issued August 19, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-24-00771-CV
———————————
AHMAD FATEMIZADEH, Appellant
V.
SUGAR CREEK COUNTRY CLUB, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 23-DCV-311210

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Ahmad Fatemizadeh has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal

because the parties have reached a settlement. In his certificate of conference,

appellant’s counsel stated that he attempted to reach opposing counsel concerning

the motion to dismiss, but he was unable to reach him. Therefore, the Court held
this motion for 10 days to permit the filing of any opposition or response. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 10.3(a). No response was received.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.