In the Interest of J.R., a Child — Abatement Order
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas 10-26-00378-CV In the Interest of J.R., a Child On appeal from the County Court at Law No. One of Ellis County, Texas Judge James S. Chapman, presiding Trial Court No. 117032CCL PER C URIAM order of the Court. A B A T E M E N T O R D E R Appellant, H.B., appealed a judgment that terminated her parental rights. Subsequently, she filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Appellant has filed a motion in this Court seeking an abatement of this appeal for the trial court to enter its findings of fact and conclusions of law. This Court requested a response from the department as to the department’s agreement or objection to Appellant’s motion. The department agrees with the abatement to allow the trial court to enter an amended order adding the required findings relating to reasonable efforts made to return the child to her mother, but disagrees with the rest of the motion.
In the Interest of J.R., a Child Page 2 In her motion, Appellant acknowledges that the trial court signed findings of fact and conclusions of law prior to the filing of her motion, but alleges that she filed a “request for additional/amended findings of fact and conclusions of law” on the same day as the motion was submitted to this Court. However, she did not attach a copy of her request to her motion. Texas Family Code Section 161.001(f) provides that: (f) In a suit for termination of the parent-child relationship filed by the Department of Family and Protective Services, the court may not order termination of the parent-child relationship under Subsection (b)(1) unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence and describes in writing with specificity in a separate section of the order that: (1) the department made reasonable efforts to return the child to the parent before commencement of a trial on the merits and despite those reasonable efforts, a continuing danger remains in the home that prevents the return of the child to the parent[.] T EX . FAM. C ODE . § 161.000(f). The trial court ordered the termination of the parent-child relationship under Subsection (b)(1), and thus, its order must comport with Texas Family Code Subsection (f). However, the trial court’s termination order lacks specific written findings describing with specificity the reasonable efforts made by the department to return the child to the parent. See id. Appellant’s motion is granted as to the required findings set forth in this Order. Accordingly, we order this cause abated and remanded to the trial court
In the Interest of J.R., a Child Page 3 to enter the required findings describing with sufficient specificity the reasonable efforts made to return the child to the parent. See TEX . R. A PP . P. 43.6, 44.4. The trial court is also directed to consider any timely filed request for additional or amended findings of fact and conclusions of law and may enter any additional findings it deems proper. We express no opinion on whether additional or amended findings should be entered. The parties are encouraged to assist the trial court as needed in complying with this Order. These findings must be included in a supplemental clerk’s record to be forwarded to this court on or before Wednesday, November 4, 2026. This appeal will be automatically reinstated upon the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record or on Wednesday, November 4, 2026, whichever is earlier. ORDER ISSUED and FILED: October 21, 2026 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Harris, and Justice Westerfeld Appeal abated Motion granted
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.