Grayson v. United States

1 Cite as: 608 U. S. ____ (2026)
A
LITO, J., dissenting
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
ASHLEY GRAYSON v. UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 25–851. Decided June 22, 2026
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judg-
ment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further con-
sideration in light of the position asserted by the Solicitor
General in his brief for the United States filed on May 12,
2026.
J
USTICE ALITO, dissenting.
Petitioner challenges the admission of a FaceTime re-
cording that shows her offering to pay for murder. The
Sixth Circuit held that 18 U. S. C. §2515 did not require
suppression of the recording because that provision has a
freestanding clean-hands exception. The United States
now concedes that the Sixth Circuit erred in applying a
clean-hands exception. Nonetheless, the Government ar-
gues that any error was harmless. I agree. Even setting
aside the FaceTime recording, a mountain of properly ad-
mitted evidence proved petitioner’s guilt. Most promi-
nently, the evidence included a recording of a separate call
petitioner made to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in
which she described the contents of the challenged
FaceTime call in detail and acknowledged that she had of-
fered to pay for murder. Because the FaceTime recording
was cumulative of other overwhelming evidence of guilt, I
would deny the petition.