State v. Christopher David Shumpert

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Christopher David Shumpert, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-000568

Appeal From Lexington County
Debra R. McCaslin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-240
Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 20, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, and Christopher David Shumpert, pro se, both
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.