In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael Terrance Lawyer

CourtListener 10854115Scctapp06.05.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael
Terrance Lawyer, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2024-001439

Appeal From Clarendon County
R. Kirk Griffin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-211
Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 6, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Kindle Kay Johnson, of K. Johnson Law Firm, LLC, of
Charleston, and Michael Terrance Lawyer, pro se, both
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Christopher Runyan,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.