CourtListener 10854109•State v. D'Quan Bolton
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
D'Quan Lamar Bolton, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2024-001275
Appeal From York County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-202
Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 6, 2026
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon
Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1
THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.