State v. James E. Carson

CourtListener 10850237Scctapp29.04.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James Edward Carson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2025-000178

Appeal From Richland County
Charles J. McCutchen, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-191
Submitted April 23, 2026 – Filed April 29, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Wesley Chandler Norville, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing, and Solicitor Byron E. Gipson, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.