State v. Raekwon M. Ellerbe

CourtListener 10814763Scctapp25.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Raekwon Malik Ellerbe, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001563

Appeal From Chesterfield County
Michael S. Holt, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-133
Submitted March 19, 2026 – Filed March 25, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of
Columbia, and Raekwon Malik Ellerbe, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.