SCDSS v. Irwin D. Wilson

CourtListener 10797834Scctapp23.02.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Rita Wilson and Irwin Demetrice Wilson, Defendants,

of whom Irwin Demetrice Wilson is the Appellant

and

Rita Wilson is a Respondent.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2025-001309

Appeal From Richland County
C. Vance Stricklin, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-100
Submitted February 18, 2026 – Filed February 23, 2026

AFFIRMED

Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Kathryn J. Walsh, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Spartanburg, for Respondent South
Carolina Department of Social Services.

Nancy Carol Fennell, of Irmo, for Respondent Rita
Wilson.

Angela L. Kohel, of Richland County CASA, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Irwin Demetrice Wilson appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2025). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Wilson's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

GEATHERS, HEWITT, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.