Daniel Geddes v. Jacob Craine

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Daniel Cole Geddes and Rebecca B. Geddes,
Respondents,

v.

Jacob Alan Craine, Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2024-000971

Appeal From Spartanburg County
Angela J. Moss, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-380
Submitted November 14, 2025 – Filed November 17, 2025

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Patrick Hugh Allan, of Spartanburg, as the Guardian ad
Litem for Appellant.

Laura Anne Filler, of Filler Law Firm, of Boiling
Springs, for Respondents.
Samantha Sarratt Adair, of Spartanburg, as the Guardian
ad Litem for the minor child.

PER CURIAM: Jacob Alan Craine appeals the family court's final order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(Supp. 2025). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Craine's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.