State v. Winfrey

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jesse Winfrey, Appellant.

Appeal from Beaufort County

J. Cordell Maddox, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-147

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 6, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief
Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Jesse Winfrey appeals the revocation of his
probation.  Winfrey contends the plea court erred in revoking his probation
because his parole agent was not an attorney but presented the State’s case.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Winfrey’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, SHORT, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.