State v. Shaw

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ernest Teddy
Shaw, III, Appellant.

Appeal From Orangeburg County

 James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-168

Submitted March 3, 2008 – Filed March 12,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Ernest
Shaw appeals his guilty plea to criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature.  On appeal, Shaw maintains the plea court, by advising
him of his right to appeal, rendered his plea conditional, and therefore,
invalid under our jurisprudence.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Shaw’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., and PIEPER, J., and CURETON, A.J.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.