CourtListener 10156191•State v. Vaughn
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Angela Vaughn, Appellant.
Appeal From Anderson County
Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-167
Submitted March 3, 2008 Filed March 12,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Michael W. Barcroft, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Angela Vaughn appeals her convictions and sentences
for murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime.
On appeal, Vaughn maintains the trial court erred in admitting testimony of an
alleged threat to the victim, allowing hearsay testimony from the victims
co-workers, and failing to grant a directed verdict. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Vaughns appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN,
C.J., and PIEPER, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.