State v. Adams

CourtListener 10156126Scctapp05.08.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Terrance
Gilbert Adams, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-435

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 5,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Terrance Gilbert Adams appeals his convictions and
sentences for six charges of first-degree
burglary, six charges of petit larceny, one charge of resisting arrest, and one
charge of possession of burglary tools.  He argues the circuit court erred in
denying his motion to suppress evidence as the product of an unlawful search
and seizure.  Adams filed a separate pro se brief.  After a thorough review
of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] Adams’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

KONDUROS, J., CURETON,
A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.