State v. Lay

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Alicia Ann Lay, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-443

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 6,
2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin S. Brackett, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Alicia
Ann Lay appeals her guilty plea to common law robbery, assault and battery of a
high and aggravated nature, criminal conspiracy, and financial transaction card
theft.  Lay argues the trial court erred by considering her prior North Carolina conviction.  After a thorough review
of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Lay’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

KONDUROS,
J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.