State v. Reese

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kevin Reese, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-439

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 6,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Kevin Reese pled guilty to two counts of entering a
bank with the intent to steal, and he received concurrent sentences of fifteen
years each.  Reese’s counsel argues the trial court erred in accepting Reese’s
guilty plea, maintaining it did not comply with the mandates set forth in Boykin
v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969).  Reese filed a pro se brief
and argues the trial court erred by accepting his guilty plea because an
indictment was never returned by the grand jury.      After
a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss  Reese’s appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

KONDUROS,
J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.