CourtListener 10156116•State v. Southall
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Stephen
Southall, Appellant.
Appeal From Colleton County
Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-441
Submitted August 1, 2008 Filed August 6,
2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Katherine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Issac McDuffie Stone, III, of Beaufort, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: While on probation, Stephen Southall pled guilty to
two counts of possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine and one count
of distribution of crack cocaine, and was sentenced to concurrent terms of ten
years imprisonment for each offense. As a result, Southalls probation was
revoked for one year, to run concurrent with the sentences imposed for his
guilty plea. Southall argues the trial court erred by considering parole
eligibility when sentencing. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Southalls
appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
KONDUROS,
J., CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.