State v. Bryant

CourtListener 10156113Scctapp07.08.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Patrick
Percival Bryant, Appellant.

Appeal From Georgetown County

 John L. Breeden, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-457

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 7,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission on Indigent
Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott Office
of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, Fifteenth
Circuit Solicitor’s Office, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Patrick Percival Bryant appeals his conviction and
sentence for criminal domestic violence
of a high and aggravated nature, arguing the circuit court erred in admitting a
police officer’s testimony that the victim stated she believed Bryant had a
gun.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Bryant’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, J., CURETON, A.J., and
GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.