State v. Williams

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

State, Respondent,

v.

Furman Jamar
Williams, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.   2008-UP-454

Submitted August 1, 2008 – Filed August 7,
2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Furman Jamar Williams appeals his probation
revocation.  His probation was revoked for five years and then terminated. 
Williams argues the trial court erred by revoking his probation for failure to
pay fines.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Williams’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

KONDUROS, J., CURETON,
A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.