CourtListener 10156064•State v. Lavaras Shell
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lavaras S.
Shell, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-567
Submitted December 1, 2009 Filed
December 2, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Elizabeth A.
Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Lavaras S. Shell appeals his guilty plea for distribution of crack
cocaine and strong arm robbery, arguing the sentence imposed was too harsh. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CURETON,
A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.