CourtListener 10156055•State v. James McCrorey
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
James McCrorey, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
J.C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-572
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed
December 3, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: James McCrorey appeals from his guilty plea to financial transaction
card theft, arguing the plea court erred in failing to him he was waiving the
right to confront his accusers. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.