State v. Troyell Scarborough

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Troyell
Scarborough, Appellant.

Appeal From Lee County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-576

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
December 3, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Troyell Scarborough appeals from his guilty plea to resisting arrest with
a deadly weapon, strong armed robbery, failure to stop for a blue light, and
assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, arguing his guilty plea
failed to conform with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395
U.S. 238 (1969).  After a
thorough review of the record and brief, pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.