The State Tabitha Brittingham

CourtListener 10156049Scctapp03.12.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tabitha Deonna Brittingham, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

J. Michelle Childs, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-575

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
December 3, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Katherine H. Hudgins,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tabitha Deonna Brittingham appeals from her guilty plea to leaving the scene of
the accident resulting in death, arguing the plea court erred in failing to
impose a sentence less than the negotiated five-year-cap.  After a thorough review of the record and brief,
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.