CourtListener 10156037•State v. Aaron Brewton
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Aaron Brewton, Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Wyatt T. Saunders, Jr, Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-598
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed
December 15, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of
Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Aaron Brewton appeals from his guilty plea to trafficking in crack
cocaine, second offense, and possession of a weapon, arguing his guilty plea
failed to conform with the mandates set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395
U.S. 238 (1969). After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
CURETON, A.J., and GOOLSBY, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.