State v. Jackson

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Sirmedra
Jackson, Appellant.

Appeal From Barnwell County

Judge R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-553

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 19, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all  of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Sirmedra Jackson appeals her conviction for
obtaining a signature or property by false pretenses, arguing the trial court
erred by admitting the photo line-up and subsequent identification of Jackson
because it was the product of an unduly suggestive and unreliable photo line-up
procedure.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.