State v. Sharpe

CourtListener 10155966Scctapp19.11.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Burl Sharpe, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-554

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 19, 2009  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Kenneth Burl
Sharpe, Jr., appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking his probation without holding a full evidentiary
hearing.  After thoroughly reviewing the record and counsel's brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Sharpe's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be
relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.