CourtListener 10155966•State v. Sharpe
Gesamter Gesetzestext
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Kenneth Burl Sharpe, Jr., Appellant.
Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-554
Submitted November 2, 2009 Filed
November 19, 2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Kenneth Burl
Sharpe, Jr., appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking his probation without holding a full evidentiary
hearing. After thoroughly reviewing the record and counsel's brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Sharpe's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be
relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT,
THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.