State v. Greg Wall

CourtListener 10155956Scctapp23.11.2009

Gesamter Gesetzestext

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Greg Wall, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-557

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 23, 2009   

Affirmed

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of
Columbia, and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Greg
Wall appeals his guilty pleas to third-degree burglary and grand larceny,
arguing the trial court erred in accepting his plea without a sufficient
factual basis.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the
following authority: State v. Sweet, 374 S.C. 1, 5, 647 S.E.2d 202, 205 (2007)
("To properly preserve an issue for review there must be a contemporaneous
objection that is ruled upon by the trial court.").

Affirmed.

Hearn,
C.J., Huff, and Geathers,
J.J., concur

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.