State v. Earle

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Sharrica Q.
Earle, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.   2009-UP-441

Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed
October 1, 2009

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Sharrica Q. Earle appeals her probation revocation,
arguing the trial court abused its discretion in revoking her probation because
the revocation prevented her from working and continuing to pay her
restitution.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

Short, Williams,
and Geathers, J.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.